Close Window

Reason vs. Homosexuality

Let us reason together this issue of homosexuality. Let us start by saying this is about the actual act of sex. Although a loving relationship between two heterosexuals is not just about sex, this issue, at its roots, is about the ability morally and legally to have a sexual relationship with a person of the same sex.

Now, let us consider the marvel of the human body. Some suppose that it is a designed creation, Devine or otherwise. Others say it is the product of evolution.

The basis of design would suggest that we are here to procreate for the pleasure and benefit of a creator.

The basic principle behind the evolutionary process is simply, life evolves. It becomes stronger, smarter, more complex, while the weaker of a species dies out. Evolution is base on furthering the species; otherwise know as survival of the fittest.

Moving the discussion onward, let us look at the methods of intercourse. The options are anal intercourse, masturbation, and vaginal intercourse. Only vaginal intercourse furthers the "Theory of Creation / Pro-Creation", and only vaginal intercourse furthers the "Theory of Evolution", as it takes one male and one female to procreate and further the species.

This leads to 2 possible conclusions:

1) That homosexuality is a genetic defect. Unfortunately the strongest evidence supporting homosexuality as being genetically based leaves us only able to call this idea a theory. Further, the idea of a genetic defect flies in the face of a designer and therefore us 'un-natural', and evolutionary reasoning would say that either men will start having babies in the future or homosexuality would disappear if not for societal and governmental influences promoting homosexuality.

2) Homosexuality has no legitimate basis. Both evolution and creation strongly support my conclusion that homosexuality is unreasonable and 'un-natural'. The argument that homosexuality is moral because it is natural cannot be true.

So why does homosexuality exist? Why is it being accepted as 'natural' when every reasonable argument tells us it is not? I challenge you, to answer these questions, but base your conclusions on the objective evidence available and not on subjective emotions, and a 'feel good' society's predisposition to just accept people the way they are.

The solution to this issue is to educate ourselves and maintain a loving, disciplined attitude toward this behavior.



Jeff Pierson

published 1997


More on Homosexuality (activism):

"Students' religious beliefs ridiculed in class"
© 1999 Jeff Pierson
Close Window